Thursday, August 1, 2013

The Curiosity "Itch"

When I was a kid, I was a huge baseball fan.  I still am actually, but when I was a kid, I was obsessed!  I played whenever I could, and I did everything I could to learn about the game.  If I was an expert in anything, it was baseball.  I even remember checking out Ken Burns’ documentary “Baseball” from the library.  It was nine videotapes long! (For our new teachers, go Google “videotape” if you’re not sure what that is.)  I watched that documentary three times one summer.  I was obsessed. 
            
One year, and I don’t remember how old, I remember being curious about how a pitcher could make a curveball, “curve.”  As a kid, I did everything I could to find out about it.  At that time there wasn’t an internet, so I had to resort to more “traditional” means of research.  I wasn’t quite sure what to look up in the encyclopedia and unless I had a baseball expert around, there wasn’t anyone I could ask.  It was a tough spot.  I had a question that was driving me nuts, and no good way to answer it! 
            
Things have changed a lot since then.  This past week at the e3 Tech Conference we learned a lot about abundance of information our students have today and how our teaching must change in order to best meet the needs of our students.  You know what hasn’t changed in that time?  Kids have a burning desire to satisfy their curiosity about driving questions!  I was curious about why that baseball could move so much, and it was like an itch that I HAD to scratch!  I worked harder on finding the answer to that question than I did on my Math homework, I’ll guarantee you that! 
            
Toward the end of last year, and then in some conversations over the summer, I’ve learned that there is a lot of uncertainly out there about this idea of a lesson objective.  It’s not that we don’t understand what an objective is, but there is some uncertainty about what it should look like when communicating it to students, etc.  We know at a basic level that an objective is what we want students to know or be able to do by the end of a lesson.  It should be something specific, so that we can do some sort of formative assessment, even if it’s as simple as thumbs up/down, to know if we accomplished what we set out to do.
            But what if our objectives were actually driving questions?  What if we were able to frame them up in a way that generated a driving curiosity in our students?  What would that do for their engagement and motivation?  How would that change our presentation of content knowledge?  We know students are highly motivated when they are working to “scratch” that curiosity “itch.”  Just like when I was a kid trying to learn about the Bernoulli principle; the real cause of the curveball, when kids are chasing after the answer to a driving question, they are motivated.  I was DRIVEN to find the answer to my question.
           
One of my favorite books on education is The Art and Science of Teaching by Marzano.  I truly believe teaching is an art.  Not everyone can do it well.  You all are here because you’ve demonstrated that you have the art for teaching.  There’s no doubt about that.  It will be a challenge to take our objectives and turn them in to driving questions.  It’s not a challenge I am mandating you do, but it is something I think is work experimenting with and thinking about.  For some objectives, it will be difficult to find a way to turn it into a question.  Here are a few pointers for doing this:
1.      Start by answering this question, “What do I want students to know or be able to do by the end of this lesson?”  This happens during the planning stage of teaching.  You have to know where you’re going before the kids can know.
2.      Next answer this question, “What do I want students to know or be able to do by the end of this lesson?” Some question, right?  Nope!  Notice the focus is on one single lesson or piece of time.  You’ve got to break the targeted knowledge into a manageable “chunk.”  You’ll never be able to formatively assess the objective if it’s not a manageable chunk.
3.      Remember that students are motivated by a challenge.  So think about how you can make the guiding question a challenge.  Kids may not be interested in finding the perimeter of a triangle, but if you bet them they can’t figure it out, you’ll probably motivate them!
4.      Remember that good, inquiry based learning still includes instruction.  It’s not that you just turn your kids loose to find the answer by hook or crook.  Remember, your job is to give them the knowledge they need to be able to problem solve.  We can’t just “stand and deliver” information any more, but we do need to provide the supports kids need to satisfy their curiosity. 


Remember, you don’t have to do this on your own.  You’ve got a collaborative team in your PLC that is all the support you need to make this work.  What about your lesson plans?  Well, please know that I would love to see objectives written in the form of a driving, or guiding question but I don’t require that.  At most basic level, for veteran teachers, plans must have a quality objective, relevant follow up activities, and some sort of assessment.  


What exactly is the “art” of teaching?  It’s helping kids discover the knowledge you want them to discover without them knowing you did it!  Thankfully, all the knowledge to be able to do this is right here already!  You are an incredible group of teachers!  Have a great weekend! 

Dave

No comments:

Post a Comment